Cozy PSC-Utility Ties Continue

In a leading candidate for least surprising story of the year, Ellen Nowak took a senior position with the American Transmission Company. 

That was predictable because Nowak is recently gone from the Wisconsin Public Service Commission. The cozy relationship between the regulators and the regulated was recounted in a recent story in the Wisconsin State Journal

“Former PSC commissioner Robert Garvin was appointed executive vice president of external affairs of WEC Energy Group in 2015. Former commissioner Ave Bie in 2005 joined the Quarles & Brady law firm representing WE Energies and other regulated utilities. Scott Neitzel, who left the PSC in 1996, later spent time as an executive with Madison Gas and Electric. Former commissioner Lauren Azar represents transmission developers and utilities with Azar Law and Eric Callisto, who departed the commission in 2015, is now a partner with firm Michael Best and helps clients with regulatory filings and other issues before the PSC.” 

And that doesn’t count failed attempts. Former PSC Chair Mike Huebsch applied for a job with Dairyland Power shortly after leading the charge to build the massive Cardinal-Hickory Creek power line, which is partly owned by Dairyland. He didn’t get the post, but records show that he was in contact with company officials around the time that the line was being considered by the commission. Huebsch also has a close personal relationship with Garvin, though he claims he didn’t discuss business with him when he was at the PSC. One could question whether that matters. Close friends know what’s in one another’s best interests. 

More of this kind of thing has been teed up by Gov. Tony Evers. Perhaps Evers’ worst appointment to any job was that of PSC Chair Rebecca Valcq. Valcq spent her entire career as a utility regulatory attorney representing WE, the state’s largest utility. She joined Huebsch and Nowak in approving Cardinal-Hickory Creek, an ATC project. WE owns 60% of ATC. Valcq refused to recuse herself and she showed outrage when it was suggested that she had a conflict of interest. 

It’s not just where Valcq came from, it’s where she’s going. Only in her 40s, it’s extremely likely that she will return to representing utilities before the PSC, after a brief mandatory waiting period, when her term on the PSC is up. And she’ll return in an even more valuable position because she’ll have at least six years of experience on the inside. 

And Evers’ other appointments were little better. Tyler Huebner had to recuse himself from any future consideration of Cardinal-Hickory Creek (he wasn’t on the commission for the original approval) because he lobbied for the line when he worked for RENEW, a nonprofit supporting wind and solar projects. RENEW hopes that the line will bring wind energy from the West. Huebner’s background in renewables, a rapidly growing part of the industry, will be very attractive to utilities once he’s done regulating utilities. 

Evers’ most recent appointment, in February, is Summer Strand. Strand was a political appointee in the Scott Walker administration and then went to work for a national engineering firm that works on, among other things, utility projects. Strand, like Valcq and Huebner, is in the middle of her career and will need employment when she leaves the PSC. What do you suppose she might do? 

If Walker or Tommy Thompson had made exactly these same appointments Democrats would have been beside themselves. But in this hyperpartisan world the wagons get circled pretty fast. These may be industry-friendly appointments, but they’re our industry-friendly appointments, gosh darn it. And in Valcq’s case, Evers touted her as the first Latina to serve on the PSC, knowing that identity politics is at the very heart of today’s Democratic Party. 

But this is all so absolutely unnecessary. Evers could have found retired judges, and they could have been women and people of color, to serve on the PSC. Judges are trained to evaluate evidence in light of the law and ideally in an impartial way, exactly what the PSC should be doing. And, one would hope, that after at least six years on the commission, a retired judge wouldn’t have that much incentive to take a job with a utility. The revolving door would likely slow, if not stop altogether. 

Ellen Nowak did just what you would have expected her to do. Don’t be surprised if, in a few years, Evers’ appointments follow her through that same door. 

A version of this piece originally appeared in Isthmus.

Published by dave cieslewicz

Madison/Upper Peninsula based writer. Mayor of Madison, WI from 2003 to 2011.

8 thoughts on “Cozy PSC-Utility Ties Continue

  1. From my limited involvement in the regulatory realm, I had determined that it is so byzantine and the stakes so high that there wouldn’t be the energy needed at the time it’s needed, I can’t imagine someone without intimate knowledge of the technical information and the high stakes making these decisions. You can’t just quick throw up new lines if you fall short, for example.
    Evers is a smart guy. I think there just might be something here you are not aware of.

    Like

    1. Evers’ latest appointment, Summer Strand, does not have this kind of knowledge. She just worked PR for an engineering company that has an interest in utility projects. So, she has all the conflicts without any of the benefits. Moreover, I disagree with your premise. This stuff is not rocket science. Anybody with half a brain can figure it out, not to mention the fact that there’s plenty of expert staff there to explain it to them.

      Like

      1. I think her previous experience with the DOA, Facilities Development and the State Building Commission are relevant. I actually wonder how the candidates come before the Governor. Maybe people with no knowledge at all of this industry, like the Circuit Court Judges you suggest, don’t have any interest. And having seen the data and the calculations that must be reviewed in order to make decisions, I think it might not be rocket science, but it is damn close. If these commissioners are to rely heavily on the staff, maybe it’s the staff you need to be more concerned about. My concern is with this immediate distrust of appointees in general, from both sides of the isle. It seems to me to be part of a larger problem. Let’s give people the benefit of the doubt. It’s not always us against them.

        Like

      2. One final argument. If you’re right that these positions require specialized knowledge, then why not appoint someone from CUB? They have that expertise in great quantity, but they come from a consumer background.

        Like

  2. The ignorance in these appointments is overwhelming. I believe the governor and his staff have a shallow understanding of regulatory duties in this state. Doyle’s dumb appointments kept state hearing examiners busy. Walker’s have similarly set the old Department of Regulation and Licensing – now the superbly, ironically-named Department of Safety and Professional Services- back about 30 years. (This is NOT an exaggeration.) Evers (and staff, because someone must be looking at the map upside down in that office) seems to treat utilities as an afterthought. I predict it is going to be impossible to find out where the billions in government broadband access largess will end up.

    Like

Leave a reply to dave cieslewicz Cancel reply