Seattle, WI

Could the Madison City Council steal majorities from national Democrats? This may seem incomprehensible, but the council is about to move further to the left, and that bodes ill for the Democratic brand everywhere.

The council has long been liberal, reflecting the progressive politics of a college town, but the current council is widely regarded as the most liberal ever. And the results of last week’s primary elections now pretty much guarantee that it will move still further leftward.

At least two seats held by left-center moderates (“moderate” only in the context of Madison politics) are almost certain to turn over to new hard-left alders.

Ald. Paul Skidmore, the long-time alder from the west side’s 9th District and the leading defender of the Madison Police Department, barely survived a primary and is not likely to win again in April. He got only 28% of the vote while challenger Nikki Conklin won with 31%. That may not seem like a big advantage until you realize that the most of the remaining 41% that went to other candidates will likely go to her in the general election.

The Madison City Council is likely to move even further left.

Skidmore is not being treated fairly. He has been accused of uttering a gender-based insult at a late night council meeting. He vigorously denies the accusation. In the fall, the council authorized a voice analysis to determine who said what, but that analysis, which was due in November, has still not been produced. So, the accusation hangs over Skidmore. If he said it, he deserves to lose. But, if he didn’t or if the evidence is inconclusive, then he should have this taken off his shoulders. No matter, though. The accusation alone is probably enough to end his service.

In the 16th District on the east side, retiring left-center Ald. Mike Tierney is stepping down and it is almost certain that he will be replaced by hard-left candidate Jael Currie. She received 48% of the vote in the primary and her nearest opponent Matt Tramel got only 19%.

In April, there is only one incumbent hard-left alder with a chance to be defeated. In the 18th District on the north side, Ald. Rebecca Kemble faces a stiff challenge from Charles Myadze. But Kemble did get just over 50% in the primary, so she has an advantage.

And the left could even pick up yet another seat. Council President Sheri Carter, who is widely respected for her even-handedness, is facing a challenge from hard-left activist Brandi Grayson in the 14th District on the south side.

Now, of course, more voters will show up in the April election and they could reverse the indications in the primary, and there are some sensible left-center alders coming back. Incumbent Alds. Barbara Harrington-McKinney and Mike Verveer are running unopposed and Gary Halverson, who is also running unopposed in the 17th District, looks promising. But right now it seems likely that the hard-left majority on the council will see its numbers increase.

So, what does all this mean? Well, we could look to Seattle and Portland. As liberal New York Times columnist Timothy Egan has written, the Biden Democrats could forge a new long-term majority. What’s in the way? “What could doom Democrats is fellow Democrats,” Egan writes. ” (The Seattle) City Council is never far from a bad idea. A recent proposal would make it the first city in the nation to appear to incentivize misdemeanor crime. Assaults, trespass, stalking — all could be excused if their offense is linked to poverty or a behavioral health disorder.”

Yet, this is exactly the kind of thing we could see coming from the Madison City Council this year. The current council has already voted down aid for State Street businesses simply because there were no Black owners, never mind that two-thirds of businesses on the street are owned by women or people of color. And they voted to spend a half million dollars in the midst of a city budget crisis to form a police oversight board whose specific purpose is to harass (that’s a fair word) a police department widely regarded as one of the best in the nation.

And, of course, Portland is a Democratic nightmare with nightly widespread violence last summer that its liberal government seemed unable or unwilling to control. In their largely ineffectual defense of Donald Trump, the one political blow his attorney’s landed at his Senate trial was when they showed Democratic politicians defending violence in the wake of the police murder of George Floyd.

In the November elections the Republicans successfully tied Democrats to that violence and to the party’s left-wing. Trump lost mostly because of Trump, but Republicans picked up a dozen seats in the House when they were expected to lose about that many. They lost the Senate by the narrowest of margins and, there again, mostly because of Trump. And the Republicans won every statehouse that the Democrats had targeted to take back.

Simply put, hard-left local politicians are aiding and abetting the party of Trump, if not Trump himself. So, what happens in cities like Seattle, Portland and Madison will be used to further tar the Democratic brand, no matter how moderate the specific candidate might be. Extremist policy proposals and rhetoric out of Madison could help defeat Democratic moderates in districts hundreds of miles away.

In this way, that hyper-local, low turnout February primary in our mid-size Midwest college town blew an ill-wind for any hope of a sustained national Democratic majority and all the good it might do over the long haul.

After last Tuesday, I am growing in my feeling that the far left will ruin any chance for sensible, center-left progress after the next year or so. I hope I’m wrong.


Published by dave cieslewicz

Madison/Upper Peninsula based writer. Mayor of Madison, WI from 2003 to 2011.

6 thoughts on “Seattle, WI

  1. Your description of the symptoms is a good one, Your Honor. But more troubling questions need to be asked. What if the avalanche of ill-liberalism was catalyzed by classical liberalism and the Enlightenment? What if what we are seeing now is, in effect, inevitable? Why Liberalism Failed by Patrick Deneen convincingly (IMHO) makes the case for this. And he would be the first to say he stands on the shoulders of giants like Lasch. There are a treasure trove of excellent podcasts which delve into this.


  2. Dave wrote, “I am growing in my feeling that the far left will ruin any chance for sensible, center-left progress after the next year or so.”

    The the loud mouthed extremes of the political left have been allowed to take over the voice of the political left, the “center-left” is considered part of the evil right to these extremists, oppose them in any way and you will feel their wrath.

    This is the mindset of the extremes in the political left towards anyone that opposes them…

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Dave,
    What you are seeing in the political arena in Madison is totalitarians are physically taking over positions of leadership because they currently have the loudest voices in Madison and that is a real problem. It seems to me that Liberals and moderates have completely washed their hands of politics in Madison because of the lunacy that is wrought by these social justice totalitarian extremists, they don’t know how to rhetorically fight these totalitarian extremists and they have been intimidated into silence. In a very real sense, the same kind of thing can be said of the extreme right what you would likely call authoritarians vs Conservatives.

    It requires effective leadership from moderates on both sides of the political aisle to bring about a change that in-turn will move Madison politics back towards the center. It’s time that moderate Liberals and moderate Conservatives unite against the extremes and bring about change and the biggest threat to our society right now are the totalitarians.

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend.


    Strong Leaders Are Needed To Inspire Nationwide Grass Roots Movements To Support The Constitution & Confront Totalitarianism

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’ve made the point in other forums that Madison needs a new center-left moderate party to counter Progressive Dane. Let’s be fair. PD wins elections because they work hard at it, while there is no organized opposition. You can’t beat somebody with nobody. Dave

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Dave wrote, “I’ve made the point in other forums that Madison needs a new center-left moderate party to counter Progressive Dane.”

    If you think a new party is needed then that means the old party is completely lost to the extremists. That’s defeatist, isn’t it? Why not find a way to push the extremists out, of course that would take the right kind of leadership.

    Dave wrote, “Let’s be fair. PD wins elections because they work hard at it, while there is no organized opposition. You can’t beat somebody with nobody.”

    You’ll get no disagreement from me on that point. The only “organized opposition” right now is Independents and Republicans and the moderate Liberals in Madison are so intolerant that they would rather vote for the anti-American totalitarian extremists than vote for an Independent or a Republican; I see this as a very serious problem.

    New party? I honestly don’t think Madison Liberals will vote for anything that doesn’t have a (D) for Democrat associated with it, therefore the loud mouthed progressive extremists are going to win every election as long as Liberals don’t forcibly push them out of the Democratic Party. In other words make the extremists create their own “new” party.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: