Could Madison’s School Referenda Elect Trump?

Could Madison voters do the unthinkable? No, not vote for Donald Trump. Let’s be serious. I mean could they vote down a school referendum? And if they do that, could it chip away at the overwhelming margin that Biden will win by in the city come November thereby nudging a close election in Trump’s direction?

Madison voters have not rejected a school referendum since 2005 and the most recent referendums have passed by three-to-one margins. But that could change this fall. It is all but certain that later this month the school board will put two questions on the same ballot as the presidential election. If they stick with the plan as outlined in today’s Wisconsin State Journal the two referendums would add hundreds of dollars to the average Madison property tax bill each of the next few years, culminating in a total hit of an additional $1,300 by 2028.

This is some sticker shock. For the first time in a couple of decades I’m not absolutely certain that a school referendum will pass in Madison. We’ll have to see about two things. First will the public reaction to the proposal be so strong that the board trims back on the questions before it makes its final vote to put them on the ballot? And second, if they do go ahead with a number this big will it generate organized opposition?

To complicate matters, the city of Madison is still mulling its own ballot question. The city faces a $22 million budget hole and it looks to face two options. It can go to referendum to exceed state taxing limits or it can dip more deeply into its rainy day fund. That fund is flush, but the practice of funding ongoing operations out of savings isn’t sustainable in the long run. My guess right now is that, if the school board moves ahead with its referendums at the current number, the city will go to its reserves and put off the inevitable referendum for another year. Because if the city asks to add several hundred dollars to that $1,300 from the schools it makes it even more likely that all these questions will go down.

All of this is further complicated by the current mood of the city. The top issue, as defined by policy makers, is the cost of housing. Prices for both renters and those looking to buy a home are going up fast, mostly because developers can’t keep pace with demand. Adding $1,300 or more to the average property tax bill is going to make a tough problem much tougher.

Related to that is a backlash to city plans to increase housing density. A small revolt has started on the West Side, sparked by a proposed city plan that would have rezoned some properties for potentially bigger residential buildings. Unhappiness over that has boiled over into some grumbling over the city budget. That’s another reason for the city to put off its own referendum.

If you don’t live in Madison you might not care about any of this. But here’s the interesting statewide question. What if the school board goes ahead with its $1,300 proposal? What if there’s organized opposition? And what if that opposition turns out conservative voters who wouldn’t bother to vote otherwise? What if some conservative voters, who wouldn’t normally support Trump, become so angered by liberal management of their schools that they vote for him out of frustration?

And what if all that narrows Biden’s margin in Madison by just, say, two or three percent? That would mean about 5,000 votes. In a state likely to be decided by 20,000 votes either way and combined with smaller margins for Biden here and there, that could flip Wisconsin, and with it the whole election.

Published by dave cieslewicz

Madison/Upper Peninsula based writer. Mayor of Madison, WI from 2003 to 2011.

4 thoughts on “Could Madison’s School Referenda Elect Trump?

  1. It’s always scary to me when we full-tilt agree on something.

    Also ponder this:

    At the “Lux,” the fancy apartment building where at least ten young people were wounded by gunshots over the weekend while partying on the rooftop, little information is available on the facility, the event, the attendees, how they got there, were they drunk, why are police saying it was “unauthorized” (really, on the roof, with 250 people?) (You mean there are “authorized” rooftop shootings we don’t know about?) But the website for this “Yugo” facility includes this: <>”Only thing better than being a badger is living life at Madison Lux! Choose from our high-spec one or two-bed apartments, with full access to a beautiful 360 view Skydeck, rooftop pool, and firepit lounge.” Also, you don’t just walk off the street on to the roof. You have to get there somehow. No control? Their website brags about “controlled building access.” Apparently it was BYOURHG (Bring Your Own Unregistered Handgun). Platitudes from the police chief and hand-wringing cliches from the mayor. And not even one mention in any media on who owns the property? The best part of the coverage so far has been the cool WSJ drone views of the building and rooftop. 433 W. Johnson St.

    >

    Like

    1. I am up for the change of subject to the shooting last weekend. It’s not as if this is the first time there have been issues at the Lux rooftop based on the online reviews (see below). I expect most of the large apartments downtown catering to students aren’t any different.

      Becca Bloomer

      2 reviews10 months ago

      Tons of kids party here all night on the rooftop. Cops have came multiple times and they still come up to the roof and party and trash everything. They ended getting the pool closed for the residents. When they aren’t even residents!!! Insane that i am paying for amenities that aren’t even available due to actions caused by non residents who are breaking into the building. May i add an obvious security issue? They keep propping the doors open allowing anybody into the building. So instead of taking extra measures, they blame us residents and close the pool. Do better. Will definitely be exploring new options when leasing season comes around again

      Like

  2. In the real world, at least until you have monopolistic control over your market, you have to demonstrate competence and value for what you produce. If you don’t, you’re out of business.

    When you play with other people’s money, ie taxation, you get a free pass on demonstrating value and competence. Your income is legislated.

    The school board and I would also argue city government, has demonstrated an inability to manage finances. The school board has demonstrated, by any testing measures available, incompetence in producing kids able to read, write and think. Why should they get more money to do the same thing?

    I do hope the conservatives turn out in droves, but I’m guessing white guilt will over power any conservative movement.

    Like

Leave a comment