Pigging Out

Last summer I was walking my dog, Maple, on the Southwest Bike Path, a couple blocks from our home. She stopped and got low to the ground, like she does when she feels threatened and wants to make herself look smaller and more fierce (she succeeds on the first count). I looked around for what was bothering her and that’s how I met Rudi.

Rudi is a pig. He lives with his owners on Norwood Place, which backs up on the bike path. Paula Niedenthal built him an enclosure in her garden complete with a tidy little pighouse. It’s a swine place. Neidenthal even puts healthy (it’s the West Side, people) treats out for kids to toss to Rudi. The sign next to the bowl reads, “One per customer.”

The whole thing’s just kind of nice in a quirky sort of way that you’d actually expect on another side of town. It’s a little bit of East Side bohemian over here amid all the more straight-laced liberals. It’s a touch of tie dye in the land of Banana Republic.

I have to admit that, given one of my previous occupations, it occurred to me as Maple and I continued on our walk after meeting Rudi, that maybe the pig wasn’t exactly legal. But then I remembered that the ordinances had been amended to allow chickens and then amended again to allow more chickens, so I just figured that more farm animals had been added over the years. I assumed Rudi had been cleared by authorities.

Nope. Somebody squealed. An anonymous neighbor of Rudi complained to the city. The health department responded with an order that Rudi must go — by tomorrow. If he’s not gone he does not become bacon, but Niedenthal gets nailed with a $124 fine and she probably could get slopped with that every day thereafter.

Paula Niedenthal and her friend Rudi.

Alders Regina Vidaver and Tag Evers are looking into an ordinance amendment to make an exception for varieties of pet swine. That will take awhile, though it shouldn’t have to take that long. Back when I was in city government the chickens on the roof top of the Children’s Museum flew the coop, as in they went over the side and down to the street. I guess they fly well enough because, no trigger warning necessary, no poultry was hurt in this story. But here’s the thing. There were a half dozen chickens that hit the street that day and that ran afowl of the law, a maximum of four chickens being allowed in any one place.

Well, the City Council had visions of crying school children refusing to eat their chicken tenders fearing it might be Wanda or Rhonda there on their plates and, within a month, an exception was made on their behalf. Seems to me that this could be a similar situation. City government really can act quickly whenever farm animals are in question.

There are no bad guys in this story. City officials are just enforcing the ordinances. The ordinances made sense for a time when people did actually keep lots of farm animals in an urban setting and before anybody thought pigs could be pets. Even the complaining neighbor is doing everybody a favor by forcing us to bring the ordinances up to date with how people (and pigs) live today.

My guess is that by the end of the summer we’ll make a proper citizen of Rudi. Then he can just reminisce about the days when he was a page-one, bad ass outlaw pig.

Published by dave cieslewicz

Madison/Upper Peninsula based writer. Mayor of Madison, WI from 2003 to 2011.

6 thoughts on “Pigging Out

  1. Oh brother. I wonder if you’d be feeling differently if that pig was right next door to you. Or if you had pigs living on all three sides of your house. Chickens create noise and smell for their neighbors and many people do not like living next to them. I don’t understand how with all the extra people and traffic and construction in this City we now want to crowd in extra animals to the extent that all parks are open to dogs too. Color me out of this trend. I cannot put a blanket down and just relax and read in my favorite parks anymore because people let their dogs “go” all over the place. Including within a foot of me on my blanket at Wingra. I am feeling very much outnumbered by animals and it all has me wondering how all the extra scat impacts public health and our local waters. What if the current ordinances limiting farm animals in the City are smart and this new nonsense is not.

    Like

    1. I’m with you on being a little annoyed by the City continually opening up more and more parks to dogs considering how lax leash enforcement is, but I strongly disagree about Rudi. He’s quieter than a dog, spends most of his time indoors, and even uses an indoor litterbox – meaning no water quality or smell issues, and virtually no nuisance at all for neighbors.
      If chickens, which are far noisier and messier, are allowed, there’s no reason pet pegs that relieve themselves indoors shouldn’t be.

      Like

      1. That’s Rudi. Now about all the other pigs if the City changes the ordinance. You can bet that won’t be the case for all or even most of them. I also wonder how many people will think it’s fun to have a cute little pig and then realize they get big and end up rehoming it. Farm animals belong on farms. For their sakes as much as for ours.

        Like

      2. Acknowledging Deborah’s legitimate concerns, I think you could draw up an ordinance that was pretty narrow, restricting it to one pig of certain breeds and not exceeding a certain size. Also, I believe there are general nuisance ordinances that would apply if there were, for example, strong odors.

        Like

  2. It looks to me like we are in what used to be called in my family – The Summer Doldrums. A slow time where unlikely news takes the front and center. In some ways, like summer, it is a welcome relief to the daily grind.

    Please keep us apprised of the status of “The Pig.”

    A good column might be how the Madison School District is going to improve reading abilities in students and be more transparent about it with the new legislation signed by the Governor on Wednesday.

    We should all be in favor of future Madisonians to be able read better and quickly.

    Like

Leave a comment